A Flow Cytometry-Based Method for Analyzing DNA End Resection in G<sub>0</sub>- and G<sub>1</sub>-Phase Mammalian Cells

Bo-Ruei  Chen; Jessica K. Tyler; Barry P. Sleckman

doi:10.21769/BioProtoc.4413

Improve Research Reproducibility A Bio-protocol resource

Submit a Protocol
Receive Our Alerts
Log in
/
Sign up
- My Bio Page
- Edit My Profile
- Change Password
- Log Out
EN
- EN - English
- CN - 中文

Peer-reviewed

A Flow Cytometry-Based Method for Analyzing DNA End Resection in G₀- and G₁-Phase Mammalian Cells

BC Bo-Ruei Chen email

JT Jessica K. Tyler

BS Barry P. Sleckman

Published: Vol 12, Iss 10, May 20, 2022 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4413 Views: 3372

Reviewed by: Chiara AmbrogioChhuttan L MeenaAnonymous reviewer(s)

PDF

Ask a question

How to cite

Favorite

Cited by

Original research article

The authors used this protocol in:

Cover of eLIFE, featuring study using the protocol.

Sep 2021

A protocol guide to micro milling for bio-microfluidics

Love Methods Week 2026: From Lab Notes to Lab Protocols

Protocol Collections

Cell Imaging - A Special Collection for Cell Bio 2023

See all

Related protocols

Quantification of Chromosomal Aberrations in Mammalian Cells

Inés Paniagua and Jacqueline J. L. Jacobs

Aug 20, 2023 2798 Views

Assay for Site-Specific Homologous Recombination Activity in Adherent Cells, Suspension Cells, and Tumor Tissues

Yuki Yoshino [...] Natsuko Chiba

Apr 5, 2025 2413 Views

Protocol for Quantifying γH2AX Foci in Irradiated Cells Using Immunofluorescence and Fiji Software

Lu Deng [...] Lingying Wu

Aug 20, 2025 2362 Views

Abstract

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) constantly arise in cells during normal cellular processes or upon exposure to genotoxic agents, and are repaired mostly by homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). One key determinant of DNA DSB repair pathway choice is the processing of broken DNA ends to generate single strand DNA (ssDNA) overhangs, a process termed DNA resection. The generation of ssDNA overhangs commits DSB repair through HR and inhibits NHEJ. Therefore, DNA resection must be carefully regulated to avoid mis-repaired or persistent DSBs. Accordingly, many approaches have been developed to monitor ssDNA generation in cells to investigate genes and pathways that regulate DNA resection. Here we describe a flow cytometric approach measuring the levels of replication protein A (RPA) complex, a high affinity ssDNA binding complex composed of three subunits (RPA70, RPA32, and RPA14 in mammals), on chromatin after DNA DSB induction to assay DNA resection. This flow cytometric assay requires only conventional flow cytometers and can easily be scaled up to analyze a large number of samples or even for genetic screens of pooled mutants on a genome-wide scale. We adopt this assay in G₀- and G₁- phase synchronized cells where DNA resection needs to be kept in check to allow normal NHEJ.

Keywords: DNA DSB

Background

Genome stability relies in large part on a timely response to and repair of DNA damage that arises during normal physiological processes such as DNA replication and exposure to genotoxic agents such as ionizing irradiation. Disruptions in these activities will lead to death of the affected cells in response to unrepairable damage or genomic rearrangement that promote oncogenic transformation (Tubbs and Nussenzweig, 2017). One of the major DNA lesions that cells encounter is DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). While all DSBs are detrimental if not repaired properly, many of them are important intermediates of critical cellular activities. For example, DSBs can be created by topoisomerase II to relieve torsional strain and supercoiled or catenated DNA during DNA replication or transcription (Nitiss, 2009). During meiosis, DSBs are induced by the nuclease SPO11 and other accessory proteins to initiate meiotic recombination (Lam and Keeney, 2014). In developing lymphocytes, DNA DSBs are generated by the RAG endonuclease, composed of RAG1 and RAG2, during V(D)J recombination to assemble functional antigen receptor genes (Schatz and Swanson, 2011).

The two major repair pathways for DNA DSBs are homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). HR is utilized during S and G₂ phases of the cell cycle when a sister chromatid is available as a template for accurate repair (Prakash et al., 2015). NHEJ is the predominant DNA DSB repair pathway in G₀, also termed quiescence, and G₁ phases of the cell cycle due to the lack of sister chromatids, although it is also functional in other cell cycle phases (Chang et al., 2017). The critical choice of HR or NHEJ for DNA DSB repair depends on whether the broken DNA ends are resected to generate extensive single strand DNA (ssDNA) overhangs, which inhibit NHEJ and are quickly bound by the trimeric ssDNA binding complex replication protein A (RPA) to initiate HR (Symington and Gautier, 2011; Ceccaldi et al., 2016; Scully et al., 2019). Given the importance of appropriately employing HR or NHEJ in different cell cycle phases and at distinct genomic territories, DNA end processing is sophisticatedly regulated by nucleases and accessory proteins that promote resection, and DNA protection proteins that counter nucleolytic activities at DSBs (Symington, 2016; Setiaputra and Durocher, 2019; Mirman and de Lange, 2020; Cejka and Symington, 2021). Proper DNA end protection is especially important for cells in G₁ and G₀ phases of the cell cycle as extensively resected DNA DSBs cannot be repaired by NHEJ. The most studied DNA end protection protein is 53BP1, and since the initial discovery of its DNA protection function, many downstream effectors have been identified, including RIF1, the Shieldin complex, and the CST complex (Setiaputra and Durocher, 2019; Mirman and de Lange, 2020).

To decipher the complex regulation of DNA end resection and protection, numerous approaches have been established to qualitatively and/or quantitatively monitor the levels of ssDNA in cells in response to endogenous or exogenous DNA damage. For example, a quantitative PCR approach on restriction enzyme-digested genomic DNA purified from cells with endonuclease-induced DSBs allows for low resolution detection of resected ssDNA near DSBs that are resistant to cleavage by restriction enzymes (Zhou et al., 2014). HCoDES and End-seq utilize different DNA structure capturing designs coupling with next generation sequencing to determine resected DNA end structure at nucleotide resolution (Dorsett et al., 2014; Canela et al., 2016). BrdU, when incorporated in the genome during DNA replication, can be used to reveal the presence of BrdU-labeled ssDNA in cells by anti-BrdU antibody staining and immunofluorescence imaging or flow cytometry in the absence of DNase I treatment (Mukherjee et al., 2015; Tkac et al., 2016).

Given that RPA rapidly binds to ssDNA with high affinity in vivo and in vitro, immunofluorescence imaging- or flow cytometry-based approaches have also been widely used to visualize the chromatin-bound RPA, as a surrogate of ssDNA, by anti-RPA antibody staining following detergent extraction to remove soluble RPA in cells (Forment et al., 2012; Mukherjee et al., 2015). Here we describe a high-throughput flow cytometry-based method, originally developed by Josep V. Forment, Rachael V. Walker, and Stephen P. Jackson, to monitor DNA end resection (Forment et al., 2012). The flow cytometric assay described here and in (Forment et al., 2012) can easily provide quantitative measurement of the levels of chromatin-bound RPA in large number of cells (tens to hundreds of thousands of cells) on conventional flow cytometers that are readily available to most research communities. We include steps that allow optimizing this assay in multiple cell types. While this method can be used for cells in any phase of the cell cycle, we also include protocols for synchronizing cells in G₀ and for identifying G₁ cells in a proliferating culture, where DNA end integrity is critical for DNA DSB repair by NHEJ (Chen et al., 2021).

Materials and Reagents

6-well plates (Corning, catalog number: 3506)
24-well plate (Corning, catalog number: 3524)
Round bottom polystyrene tubes for FACS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 149595)
Abelson leukemia viral kinase transformed pre-B cells (abl pre-B cells, custom made in lab)
MCF10A (ATCC, catalog number: CRL-10317)
Triton X-100 (Sigma, catalog number: T-8787)
Rat monoclonal anti-RPA32 (4E4) antibody (Rat monoclonal) (Cell Signaling Technology, catalog number: 2208S)
Mouse monoclonal anti-phospho-H2AX (S139) antibody (Millipore Sigma, catalog number: 05-636)
Alexa Fluor 488, goat anti-rat IgG (BioLegend, catalog number: 405418)
Alexa Fluor 647, mouse anti-rat IgG (BioLegend, catalog number: 405322)
Click-iT^TM EdU Alexa Fluor^TM 647 Flow Cytometry Assay Kit (Life Technologies, catalog number: C10419)
7-AAD (BD Biosciences, catalog number: 559925)
Mouse FITC-anti-BrdU antibody (BD Biosciences, catalog number: 556028)
BD Pharmigen^TM BrdU Flow Kit (BD Biosciences, catalog number: 559619)
DMEM, high glucose, no glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 11960077)
Fetal bovine serum/FBS (GeminiBio, catalog number: 100-106)
MEM non-essential amino acids (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 11140050)
L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 25030081)
Sodium pyruvate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 11360070)
Penicillin Streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 15140122)
2-mercaptoethanol (MP Biomedicals, catalog number: 194705)
DMEM/F-12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 11330032)
Horse serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 16050122)
EGF (Pepprotech, catalog number: AF-100-15)
Hydrocortisone (Sigma, catalog number: H-0888)
Cholera toxin (Sigma, catalog number: C-8052)
Insulin (Sigma, catalog number: I-1882)
Trypsin (Gibco, catalog number: 15090046)
Imatinib (SelleckChem, catalog number: S2475)
FACS tubes/Corning Falcon round bottom polystyrene tubes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 14-959-5)
DMEM media (for abl pre-B cells) (see Recipes)
MCF10A media (see Recipes)
FACS Wash (see Recipes)

Equipment

Allegra X-14R Centrifuge (Beckman Coulter)
XRAD 320 irradiator (Precision X-ray Inc.)
BD LSRFortessa X-20 cell analyzer (BD Biosciences)

Software

FlowJo (BD Life Sciences)

Procedure

Synchronization of cells in G₀ phase
1. Abl pre-B cells
  1. Dilute imatinib solution in DMEM media to 3 μM.
  2. Resuspend abl pre-B cells in DMEM + 3 μM imatinib at 2 × 10⁶ cells/mL.
    Notes:
    1) All cells are cultured at 37°C with 5% CO₂.
    2) All cells are spun in an Allegra X-14 R centrifuge (Beckman Coulter) at 1,200 rpm for 5 min in procedures spinning is required for collecting cells.
  3. Culture abl pre-B cells in DMEM + 3 μM imatinib for at least 48 h.
2. MCF10A cells
  1. Plate 2.5 × 10⁵ MCF10A cells in 5 mL of MCF10A media per well of 6-well tissue culture plates.
  2. Culture cells for 1 day.
  3. Aspirate media from each well and wash cells with pre-warmed 1× PBS or EGF-free MCF10A media.
  4. Add 5 mL of EGF-free MCF10A media to each well and culture cells for 2 days.
3. Verification of G₀ synchronization efficiency using BD Pharmigen^TM BrdU Flow Kit with modification (for both abl pre-B cells and MCF10A cells)
  1. Add BrdU to cells (1mL of imatinib-treated abl pre-B cells or 1 well of EGF-deprived MCF10A cells in a 6-well plate) to a final concentration of 10 μM.
    Note: Make sure to use proliferating cells as a positive control to ensure that the labeling and detection procedures are done appropriately.
  2. Incubate cells with BrdU for 30 min.
  3. Collect cells in FACS tubes.
    1. Abl pre-B cells:
      1. Resuspend cells briefly by pipetting and transfer cells directly to FACS tubes.
      2. Spin down cells, decant supernatant by inverting tubes quickly to pour out media and tapping the inverted tubes on a paper towel, and wash cells by resuspending them in 1mL of 1X FACS wash, followed by spinning down cells again.
        Note: Do not use vacuum to avoid loss of samples.
    2. MCF10A cells:
      1. Remove media and wash cells with 1mL of 1× PBS.
      2. Add 300 μL of 0.25% Trypsin to a well and return cells to the incubator for 5–10 min.
      3. Inspect cells under the microscope to ensure that most cells have detached off the plate surface.
      4. Add 1 mL of MCF10A media to resuspend cells and transfer cells to FACS tubes.
      5. Spin down cells, decant supernatant, and wash cells by resuspending cells in 1 mL of 1× FACS wash, followed by spinning down cells again.
4. Fix cells in 150 μL of BD Cytofix/Cytoperm Buffer at room temperature for 20 min.
5. Wash cells with 1 mL of 1× BD Perm/Wash Buffer.
6. Permeabilize cells by one of the following methods
  1. Freeze-and-thaw method
    1. Freeze cells in 0.5 mL of 10% DMSO in FBS at -80°C.
    2. Thaw cells at room temperature and wash freeze-thaw cells with 1 mL of 1× BD Perm/Wash Buffer.
  2. Permeabilization with detergent
    1. Resuspend cells in 150 μL of BD Permeabilization Plus Buffer and incubate on ice for 10 min.
    2. Wash cells with 1 mL of 1× BD Perm/Wash Buffer.
7. Fix cells in 150 μL of BD Cytofix/Cytoperm Buffer at room temperature for 5 min.
8. Add 100 μL of 300 μg/mL DNase I (in 1× PBS) to each tube of cells and incubate at 37°C for 1 h.
9. Wash cells with 1 mL of 1× BD Perm/Wash Buffer.
10. Stain cells with 100 μL of 1:50 diluted FITC-anti-BrdU antibody (in 1× BD Perm/Wash Buffer) at room temperature for 1 h.
11. Wash cells with 1 mL of 1× BD Perm/Wash Buffer.
12. Add 15 μL of 7-AAD to each tube of cells and incubate at room temperature for 3 min.
13. Add 300 μL of 1× PBS to each tube.
  Note: Do not wash off 7-AAD. Add 1× PBS directly to each tube and process flow cytometry analysis directly.
14. Record DNA content (7-AAD) and BrdU incorporation (FITC) on BD FACS Fortessa X-20 or an equivalent flow cytometer.
15. Analyze data using FlowJo (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Flow cytometric analysis of cycling and G₀-arrested abl pre-B cells and MCF10A cells following BrdU labeling. Dot plots depicting cell cycle profiles of cycling and cells arrested in G₀ phases by (A) imatinib treatment (abl pre-B cells) or (B) EGF withdrawal (MCF10A) cells after BrdU labeling and flow cytometry analysis for BrdU incorporation (FITC) and DNA content (7-AAD). S (BrdU-positive), G₁ (BrdU-negative, 2N DNA), and G₂ (BrdU-negative, 4N DNA) cells in cycling cultures and G₀ cells (BrdU-negative, 2N DNA) in imatinib-treated abl pre-B cell and EGF-deprived MCF10A cultures are shown in red polygon gates.
Monitoring DNA end resection by flow cytometry-based chromatin-bound RPA assay after irradiation in G₀-arrested and G₁ phase cells in proliferating cultures
1. Cell preparation
  1. G₀ abl pre-B cells: Treat abl pre-B cells with imatinib as indicated in Step A3. Aliquot 1 mL of imatinib-treated cells in wells of a 24-well plate for irradiation.
  2. G₀ MCF10A cells: Synchronize MCF10A in EGF-free MCF10A media in a 12-well plate as indicated in Step A3 for irradiation.
  3. Proliferating abl pre-B cells: Resuspend cells in pre-warmed DMEM media at 2 × 10⁶ cells/mL and aliquot 1 mL of cells in each well of a 24-well plate for irradiation.
  4. Proliferating MCF10A cells: Plate 5 × 10⁵ MCF10A cells 5 mL of MCF10A media in a well of a 6-well plate for 24 h before irradiation.
2. For analysis of G₁ phase abl pre-B or MCF10A cells from proliferating cultures, incubate cells with 10 μM EdU for 1 h before irradiation.
3. Irradiate cells in XRAD 320 irradiator.
  Note: The dosage of irradiation and the time of sample collection after IR were determined empirically, based on the distinct RPA staining intensities between 53BP1-proficient (normal DNA end protection, basal levels of resection) and 53BP1-deficient (impaired DNA end protection).
  1. Imatinib-treated (G₀) abl pre-B cells: 15Gy IR; cell collected 3–18 h after IR
  2. EGF-deprived (G₀) MCF10A cells: 30 Gy IR; cell collected 4 h after IR
  3. Proliferating abl pre-B cells: 5 Gy IR; cell collected 3 h after IR
  4. Proliferating MCF10A cells: 25 Gy IR; cell collected 6 h after IR
4. Collect cells in FACS tubes, spin down, and wash with 1 mL of FACS wash.
5. Pre-extract cells with 150 mL of cold Triton X-100 in 1× PBS on ice for 10 min
  1. Imatinib-treated (G₀) abl pre-B cells: 0.05% Triton X-100
  2. EGF-deprived (G₀) MCF10A cells: 0.5% Triton X-100
  3. Proliferating abl pre-B cells: 0.2% Triton X-100
  4. Proliferating MCF10A cells: 0.5% Triton X-100
6. Wash cells with 2 mL of FACS wash.
7. Fix cells in 150 μL of BD Cytofix/Cytoperm Buffer at room temperature for 20 min.
8. Wash cells with 1 mL of FACS wash.
9. Stain cells 100 μL of 1:500 diluted anti-RPA32 and 1:1,000 diluted anti-phospho-H2AX (S139) antibodies (in 1× BD Perm/Wash Buffer) at room temperature for 2 h.
10. Wash cells with 1 mL of 1× BD Perm/Wash Buffer.
11. Stain cells 100 μL of 1:500 diluted Alexa Fluro 488 goat anti-rat IgG and Alexa Fluro 647 goat anti-mouse IgG (in 1× BD Perm/Wash Buffer) at room temperature for 1 hour, protected from light.
12. Wash cells with 1 mL of 1× BD Perm/Wash Buffer.
13. For analysis of G₁-phase cells in EdU-pulsed proliferating cultures:
  Note: Click-iT Plus EdU imaging kit is used in place of BrdU labeling kit because DNase I treatment in the procedures of BrdU labeling kit results in poor RPA staining compared to untreated cells.
  1. Prepare Click-iT Plus reaction cocktail according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
    Note: Use Click-iT Plus reaction cocktail within 15 min of preparation.
  2. Resuspend cells in each tube in 250 μL of Click-iT Plus reaction cocktail and incubate at room temperature for 30 min, protected from light.
  3. Wash cells with 2 mL of 1× BD Perm/Wash Buffer.
14. Add 15 μL of 7-AAD and incubate at room temperature for 3 min.
15. Add 300 μL of 1× PBS to each tube.
16. Record DNA content (7-AAD), RPA (Alexa Fluro 488), and phospho-H2AX (S139) or EdU (Alexa Fluro 647) on BD FACS Fortessa X-20 or equivalent flow cytometer.
  Note: The choice of fluorophores should be based on the availability of reagents and the flow cytometers. As we use Alexa Fluro 647 for visualizing phospho-H2AX (S139) and EdU in our RPA assay, we typically do not perform phospho-H2AX (S139) staining in the analysis of proliferating cells.
17. Analyze data using FlowJo (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Flow cytometric analysis of chromatin-bound RPA levels after irradiation. (A, B) Histograms showing chromatin-bound RPA levels (Alexa Fluor 488) in G₀-arrested WT or 53BP1-deficient abl pre-B (A) or MCF10A (B) cells after IR. (C, D) The dot plots on the left show EdU incorporation (Alexa Fluor 647) and DNA content (7-AAD) in cycling abl pre-B (C) and MCF10A (D) cells, with G₁ cells shown in the red polygon gates. The histograms on the right show chromatin-bound RPA levels (Alexa Fluor 488) in G₁-phase WT or 53BP1-deficient abl pre-B (C) or MCF10A (D) cells, with red polygon gated cells in the dot plots, after IR.

Data analysis

When working with imatinib-treated abl pre-B cells and EGF-deprived MCF10A cells, generate a histogram with 7-AAD as the X-axis to identify cells with 2N DNA contents (using cycling cells as the control to determine cells with 2N and 4N DNA content) to specifically analyze levels of chromatin-bound RPA in G₀ cells (with 2N DNA).
To identify G₁-phase cells in a proliferating population for analysis of chromatin-bound RPA, generate a dot plot with Alexa Fluro 647 (EdU) as the Y-axis and 7-AAD as the X-axis to identify EdU-negative cells with 2N DNA content.

Recipes

DMEM media (for abl pre-B cells)

Reagent	Final concentration	Amount
DMEM, high glucose, no glutamine	-	860 mL
Heat-inactivated FBS	10%	100 mL
L-glutamine (200 mM)	2 mM	10 mL
Sodium pyruvate (100 mM)	1 mM	10 mL
MEM non-essential amino acids (100×)	1×	10 mL
Penicillin/streptomycin (10,000 U/mL)	100 U/mL	10 mL
2-mercaptoethanol (14.3 M)	57 mM	4 mL
Total	n/a	1,000 mL

MCF10A media

Reagent	Final concentration	Amount
DMEM/F-12	-	470 mL
Horse serum	5%	25 mL
EGF (100 μg/mL)	20 ng/mL	100 μL
Hydrocortisone (1 mg/mL)	0.5 μg/mL	250 μL
Cholera toxin (1 mg/mL)	100 ng/mL	50 μL
Insulin (10 mg/mL)	10 μg/mL	500 μL
Penicillin/streptomycin (10,000 U/mL)	100 U/mL	5 mL
Total	-	500 mL

FACS Wash
Reagent Final concentration Amount
Heat-inactivated FBS 2% 10 mL
10× PBS 1× 50 mL
MilliQ H₂O - 440 mL
Total - 500 mL

Acknowledgments

B.P.S. is supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01 AI047829 and R01 AI074953. J.K.T. is supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01 CA095641 and R35 GM139816. B.P.S. and J.K.T. are also supported by the Starr Cancer Consortium. This protocol is largely derived from the original work of Josep V. Forment, Rachael V. Walker, and Stephen P. Jackson (Forment et al., 2012) and from Bo-Ruei Chen et al. (Chen et al., 2021).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

Canela, A., Sridharan, S., Sciascia, N., Tubbs, A., Meltzer, P., Sleckman, B. P. and Nussenzweig, A. (2016). DNA Breaks and End Resection Measured Genome-wide by End Sequencing. Mol Cell 63(5): 898-911.
Ceccaldi, R., Rondinelli, B. and D'Andrea, A. D. (2016). Repair Pathway Choices and Consequences at the Double-Strand Break. Trends Cell Biol 26(1): 52-64.
Cejka, P. and Symington, L. S. (2021). DNA End Resection: Mechanism and Control. Annu Rev Genet 55: 285-307.
Chang, H. H. Y., Pannunzio, N. R., Adachi, N. and Lieber, M. R. (2017). Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18(8): 495-506.
Chen, B. R., Wang, Y., Tubbs, A., Zong, D., Fowler, F. C., Zolnerowich, N., Wu, W., Bennett, A., Chen, C. C., Feng, W., et al. (2021). LIN37-DREAM prevents DNA end resection and homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks in quiescent cells. Elife 10: e68466.
Dorsett, Y., Zhou, Y., Tubbs, A. T., Chen, B. R., Purman, C., Lee, B. S., George, R., Bredemeyer, A. L., Zhao, J. Y., Sodergen, E., et al. (2014). HCoDES reveals chromosomal DNA end structures with single-nucleotide resolution. Mol Cell 56(6): 808-818.
Forment, J. V., Walker, R. V. and Jackson, S. P. (2012). A high-throughput, flow cytometry-based method to quantify DNA-end resection in mammalian cells. Cytometry A 81(10): 922-928.
Lam, I. and Keeney, S. (2014). Mechanism and regulation of meiotic recombination initiation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7(1): a016634.
Mirman, Z. and de Lange, T. (2020). 53BP1: a DSB escort. Genes Dev 34(1-2): 7-23.
Mukherjee, B., Tomimatsu, N. and Burma, S. (2015). Immunofluorescence-based methods to monitor DNA end resection. Methods Mol Biol 1292: 67-75.
Nitiss, J. L. (2009). DNA topoisomerase II and its growing repertoire of biological functions. Nat Rev Cancer 9(5): 327-337.
Prakash, R., Zhang, Y., Feng, W. and Jasin, M. (2015). Homologous recombination and human health: the roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7(4): a016600.
Schatz, D. G. and Swanson, P. C. (2011). V(D)J recombination: mechanisms of initiation. Annu Rev Genet 45: 167-202.
Scully, R., Panday, A., Elango, R. and Willis, N. A. (2019). DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20(11): 698-714.
Setiaputra, D. and Durocher, D. (2019). Shieldin - the protector of DNA ends. EMBO Rep 20(5).
Symington, L. S. (2016). Mechanism and regulation of DNA end resection in eukaryotes. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 51(3): 195-212.
Symington, L. S. and Gautier, J. (2011). Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu Rev Genet 45: 247-271.
Tkac, J., Xu, G., Adhikary, H., Young, J. T. F., Gallo, D., Escribano-Diaz, C., Krietsch, J., Orthwein, A., Munro, M., Sol, W., et al. (2016). HELB Is a Feedback Inhibitor of DNA End Resection. Mol Cell 61(3): 405-418.
Tubbs, A. and Nussenzweig, A. (2017). Endogenous DNA Damage as a Source of Genomic Instability in Cancer. Cell 168(4): 644-656.
Zhou, Y., Caron, P., Legube, G. and Paull, T. T. (2014). Quantitation of DNA double-strand break resection intermediates in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 42(3): e19.

Article Information

Copyright

Chen et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).

How to cite

Readers should cite both the Bio-protocol article and the original research article where this protocol was used:

Chen, B. R., Tyler, J. K. and Sleckman, B. P. (2022). A Flow Cytometry-Based Method for Analyzing DNA End Resection in G₀- and G₁-Phase Mammalian Cells. Bio-protocol 12(10): e4413. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4413.
Chen, B. R., Wang, Y., Tubbs, A., Zong, D., Fowler, F. C., Zolnerowich, N., Wu, W., Bennett, A., Chen, C. C., Feng, W., et al. (2021). LIN37-DREAM prevents DNA end resection and homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks in quiescent cells. Elife 10: e68466.

Download Citation in RIS Format

A Flow Cytometry-Based Method for Analyzing DNA End Resection in G0- and G1-Phase Mammalian Cells

A Flow Cytometry-Based Method for Analyzing DNA End Resection in G₀- and G₁-Phase Mammalian Cells