发布: 2026年01月20日第16卷第2期 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.5581 浏览次数: 29
评审: Noelia ForesiAnonymous reviewer(s)

相关实验方案

利用改进的培养方法和生长监测对嗜盐火山生菌进行表型分析的次氯酸盐胁迫试验
Paula Mondragon [...] Julie A. Maupin-Furlow
2022年11月20日 1539 阅读
Abstract
Underwater noise is a growing source of anthropogenic pollution in aquatic environments. However, few studies have evaluated the impact of underwater noise on aquatic invertebrates. More importantly, studies involving early developmental stages have been poorly addressed. Significant limitations are due to the lack of standardized protocols for working in the laboratory. Particularly, the design of uniform procedures in the laboratory is important when working with species that inhabit short-term changing habitats, such as estuaries, which makes it difficult to carry out repeated experiments in the natural habitat. Besides, controlling for environmental variables is also important when assessing the effect of a stressor on the physiological parameters of individuals. This experimental protocol addresses that gap by offering an adaptable laboratory-based method to evaluate sublethal physiological responses to sound exposure under highly controlled conditions. Here, we present a reproducible and accessible laboratory protocol to expose crabs to recorded boat noise and evaluate physiological responses using oxidative stress biomarkers. The method is designed for ovigerous females, as we evaluated the effects on embryos and early life stages (i.e., larvae), but it can be readily adapted to different life stages of aquatic invertebrates. A key strength of this protocol is its simplicity and flexibility: animals are exposed to noise using submerged transducers under well-controlled laboratory conditions, ensuring consistency and repeatability. Following exposure, tissues or whole-body samples can be processed for a suite of oxidative stress biomarkers—glutathione-S-transferase (GST), catalase (CAT), lipid peroxidation (LPO), and protein oxidation. These biomarkers are highly responsive, cost-effective indicators that provide a sensitive and early readout of sublethal stress. Together, the exposure and analysis steps described in this protocol offer a powerful and scalable approach for investigating the physiological impacts of underwater noise in crustaceans and other aquatic invertebrates.
Key features
• Enables measurement of oxidative stress markers across different life stages—from embryos to larvae and adult tissues—offering a complete view of physiological impact.
• Ensures consistent, reproducible conditions through standardized exposure and sampling, supporting reliable comparisons across experiments.
• Flexible protocol adaptable to Neohelice granulata and other estuarine decapods or marine benthic invertebrates, broadening its applicability.
Keywords: Anthropogenic noise (人为噪声)Graphical overview
Background
Underwater noise pollution from motorboats and other human activities is increasingly recognized as a significant stressor in coastal and estuarine ecosystems [1]. Benthic crustaceans are especially vulnerable to acoustic disturbance due to their lifestyle, having restricted locomotion behaviors to escape from the noise source, compared to fish or marine mammals. While many previous studies have explored the behavioral and physiological effects of anthropogenic noise on marine vertebrates (see reviews for marine mammals [2] and fish [3]), standardized protocols for assessing oxidative stress responses across multiple developmental stages in invertebrates remain very limited (see review [4]). The semiterrestrial crab Neohelice granulata is a widely distributed and ecologically relevant species due to its role as an ecosystem engineer, serving as a valuable model for investigating the effects of underwater noise on its physiology [5]. This species is frequently exposed to fluctuating environmental conditions since it inhabits the intertidal zone of estuaries, salt marshes, and mangroves of the southwestern Atlantic Ocean, which implies a difficulty in carrying out experiments in the natural environment. This protocol addresses this gap by providing a controlled laboratory method to reproduce boat noise exposure and to measure oxidative stress biomarkers in embryos and larvae. Moreover, it could be extrapolated to studies involving adult tissues. Its reproducibility and adaptability make it a valuable tool for advancing research in marine ecotoxicology and understanding the sublethal effects of underwater noise on aquatic crustaceans.
Noise produced by motorized vessels is one of the most prevalent forms of underwater acoustic pollution. These vessels predominantly emit low-frequency sounds (10–500 Hz), which travel faster and farther underwater than in air, sometimes covering hundreds to thousands of kilometers and potentially affecting organisms across multiple ecological levels [6,7]. In benthic invertebrates—especially during early developmental stages—exposure to anthropogenic noise can disrupt physiological homeostasis, delay or accelerate developmental timing, and dysregulate stress-response pathways. For example, chronic boat-noise playback shortened embryonic development in N. granulata and produced physiological and biochemical changes in offspring (e.g., altered heart rate and elevated lipid peroxidation [8]). Similarly, repeated exposure to boat noise reduced embryo survival by approximately 20% in a marine gastropod, with corresponding impairments in larval viability [9]. Broad reviews of anthropogenic noise effects on marine biota also report that invertebrates exhibit changes in oxidative stress biomarkers, energy metabolism, and immune function when exposed to low-frequency noise [10]. For species like N. granulata, which inhabits shallow estuarine areas with frequent boat traffic, understanding the effects of this type of stressor is essential. The ability to evaluate oxidative stress responses in embryos and larvae under controlled conditions provides a robust framework for identifying early markers of sublethal stress and for examining how environmental challenges may influence different life stages. Conducting these experiments under controlled laboratory conditions is particularly important for estuarine species like N. granulata, as natural environments are highly dynamic, with substantial variability in temperature, salinity, oxygen levels, and other stressors that can fluctuate markedly within and between a few days. Laboratory-based approaches help isolate the effects of sound exposure from these confounding factors, enabling more accurate and reproducible assessment of the organism’s responses.
Despite the current growing evidence of noise impacts on aquatic invertebrates, there still remains a notable shortage of standardized laboratory protocols designed to investigate how such mechanical disturbances influence early life stages under controlled laboratory conditions [8,11]. This protocol was developed to help fill that gap. It offers a reproducible and accessible laboratory approach for exposing ovigerous females of N. granulata (and thus, subsequently embryos and larvae) to recorded boat noise. The setup uses submerged transducers to deliver sound in a controlled aquatic laboratory environment, ensuring consistency in exposure conditions across experiments. The method is straightforward and adaptable, allowing researchers to adjust exposure time, acoustic parameters, and sample type depending on the question at hand or the species involved. A major strength of this protocol lies in its integration with biochemical tools for evaluating organismal responses. Oxidative stress biomarkers—glutathione-S-transferase (GST), catalase (CAT), lipid peroxidation (LPO), and protein oxidation—provide early and sensitive indicators of physiological stress [12]. These markers are well-established in ecotoxicology: for instance, in octopus (Octopus vulgaris), coordinated increases in CAT, GST, and LPO were observed in digestive gland and arm tissues in response to metal exposure, validating their use as reliable biomarkers [13]. Similarly, studies in fish have documented that GST and CAT activities rise significantly under environmental stress (e.g., heavy metals or pharmaceuticals), preceding visible damage and correlating with pollutant levels [14]. Recent studies on sound exposure in N. granulata show that LPO, protein oxidation, and GST and CAT activities are biomarkers of oxidative stress under these conditions [5,8,15]. However, it is important to mention that the inclusion of other enzymes is also relevant, given that not all enzymes necessarily increase under stress. Moreover, these assays are relatively cost-effective, technically straightforward, and suitable for moderate-throughput screening. By combining acoustic exposure with these robust biochemical endpoints, this protocol delivers a versatile and scalable framework for investigating how anthropogenic noise affects aquatic invertebrates across life stages. Beyond its immediate application in physiology and toxicology, the protocol can be readily expanded to include behavioral assessments, multi-stressor designs (e.g., noise combined with temperature, hypoxia, or pollutants), and conservation-oriented questions. Its flexibility makes it suitable not only for laboratory-based mechanistic studies but also as a foundational tool for understanding broader ecological consequences of sound pollution in coastal and estuarine ecosystems.
Materials and reagents
Biological materials
1. Ovigerous adult Neohelice granulata females with embryos in an initial stage of development
Reagents
1. Milli-Q or distilled water
2. Absolute ethanol 99.5% Pro-análisis (ACS, Cicarelli, catalog number: 752)
3. Tris(hidroximetil)-aminometano hydrochloride (Tris-HCl) (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: T3253)
4. Bradford reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: B6916)
5. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: A9418)
6. Potassium phosphate dibasic (K2HPO4) MW 174.18 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 1.05104)
7. Potassium phosphate monobasic (KH2PO4) MW 136.1 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 1.05108)
8. 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) MW 202.55 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 237329)
9. L-Glutathione reduced (GSH) MW 307.3 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: G6013)
10. Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) MW 220.35 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: W218405)
11. Potassium chloride (KCl) MW 74.55 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: P3911)
12. Acetic acid, glacial (Supelco, catalog number: 1.00066)
13. Sodium chloride (NaCl) MW 55.44 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: S9888)
14. 2-Thiobarbituricacid (TBA) MW 144.15 (Supelco, catalog number: 1.08180)
15. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) MW 288.38 (Roche, catalog number: 11667289001)
16. 1-Butanol (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 360465)
17. 1,1,3,3-Tetramethoxypropane (TMP) MW 164.20 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 108383)
18. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) MW 34.01 (Supelco, catalog number: 1.07298)
19. Tris(hidroximetil)aminometano (Tris-base) MW 121.14 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 252859)
20. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) MW 372.24 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: E9884)
21. Hydrochloric acid (HCl) (Supelco, catalog number: 1.15186)
22. 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: S548685)
23. Ethyl acetate (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 319902)
24. Guanidine hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: G3272)
25. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) MW 40 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 221465)
26. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) MW 163.39 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: T4885)
Solutions
1. Extraction buffer (Tris-HCl 0.1 M pH 7.8) (see Recipes)
2. Potassium phosphate buffer (see Recipes)
3. CDNB solution (see Recipes)
4. GSH solution (see Recipes)
5. Catalase reaction buffer (see Recipes)
6. BHT stock solution (see Recipes)
7. Homogenization buffer (KCl + BHT) (see Recipes)
8. Acetic acid solution (see Recipes)
9. 2-tiobarbituric acid (TBA) solution (see Recipes)
10. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (see Recipes)
11. HCl solution (see Recipes)
12. DNPH reaction solution (see Recipes)
13. Trichloroacetic acid solution (see Recipes)
14. Ethanol-ethyl acetate solution (see Recipes)
15. Guanidine hydrochloride solution (see Recipes)
Recipes
1. Extraction buffer (Tris-HCl 0.1 M pH 7.8)
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| Tris-HCl, MW 157.6 | 0.1 M | 1.576 g |
| Distilled water | 100 mL |
2. Potassium phosphate buffer (Glutathione-S-Transferase reaction buffer or extraction buffer for carbonylation)
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| KH2PO4 | 0.05 M | 0.6805 g |
| K2HPO4 | 0.05 M | 0.871 g |
| Distilled water | 100 mL |
Adjust the pH to 7 using NaOH or HCl.
3. CDNB solution
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| CDNB | 50 mM | 0.01013 g |
| Ethanol absolute | 100% (v/v) | 1 mL |
| Total | 1 mL |
Prepare a 1 mL solution of CDNB by dissolving the reagent in absolute ethanol.
4. GSH solution
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| L-Glutathione reduced | 25 mM | 0.0115 g |
| Potassium phosphate buffer (Recipe 2) | 0.1 M | 1.5 mL |
| Total | 1.5 mL |
5. Catalase reaction buffer
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| Tris-base, MW 121.14 | 7.5 mM | 0.225 g |
| EDTA | 5 mM | 0.465 g |
| Distilled water | 250 mL | |
| Total | 250 mL |
6. BHT stock solution
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| BHT, MW 220.35 | 1.4 M | 15.4 g |
| Ethanol absolute | 50 mL | |
| Total | 50 mL |
7. Homogenization buffer (KCl + BHT)
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| KCl, MW 74.55 | 0.15 M | 0.575 g |
| BHT stock solution (1.4 M) (Recipe 6) | 0.035 M | 1.25 mL |
| Distilled water | Complete to 50 mL | |
| Total | 50 mL |
8. Acetic acid solution
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| Acetic acid | 20% | 10 mL |
| Distilled water | 40 mL | |
| Total | 50 mL |
Adjust the pH to 3.5 using NaOH.
9. TBA solution
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| TBA | 0.8% | 0.4 g |
| Distilled water | 50 mL | |
| Total | 50 mL |
Prepare a fresh TBA solution for each assay. Homogenize the solution at high temperature to fully dissolve the TBA. Allow it to cool to room temperature before use.
10. SDS
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| SDS | 560 mM | 4.05 g |
| Distilled water | 25 mL | |
| Total | 25 mL |
Do not store at 4 °C, as the solution will freeze.
11. HCl solution (2 M)
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| HCl, MW 36.46 | 2 M | 5.4 mL |
| Distilled water | 27.12 mL |
Must be prepared in a fume hood. To dilute concentrated acids, slowly add the acid to water while continuously stirring with a glass rod. Never pour water onto a concentrated acid!
12. DNPH reaction solution
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| DNPH, MW 198.14 | 10 mM | 0.0278 g |
| HCl 2 M | 14 mL |
To dilute concentrated acids, slowly add the acid to water while continuously stirring with a glass rod. Never pour water onto a concentrated acid!
13. Trichloroacetic acid solution (28%)
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| TCA, MW 163.39 | 10.5 g | |
| Distilled water | 37.5 mL |
Dissolve the TCA in 30 mL of distilled water and, after complete dissolution, adjust the volume to 37.5 mL.
14. Ethanol-ethyl acetate solution (1:1)
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| Ethanol | 125 mL | |
| Ethyl acetate | 125 mL |
Must be prepared in a fume hood.
15. Guanidine hydrochloride solution (6 M)
| Reagent | Final concentration | Quantity or volume |
|---|---|---|
| Guanidine hydrochloride, MW 95.53 | 15.762 g | |
| Distilled water | 27.5 mL |
Dissolve guanidine hydrochloride in 15 mL of distilled water and, after complete dissolution, adjust the volume to 27.5 mL. Must be prepared in a fume hood.
Laboratory supplies
1. 96-well flat-bottom microplates (Corning, catalog number: 353072)
2. 1.5-mL tubes (Eppendorf, catalog number: HS4323)
3. 50-mL tubes (Corning, catalog number: CLS430290)
4. Aluminum foil or paper towel (to shield plates from light)
5. Micropipettes (1–10, 20–200, 100–1,000 μL) and sterile tips
6. UV-transparent 96-well microplates (Corning, catalog number: CLS3635)
Equipment
1. Table centrifuge (Eppendorf, model: centrifuge 5418)
2. Vortex (VornadoTM, Benchmark Scientific, catalog number: BV101-B)
3. Spectrophotometer UV-VIS (BioTek EPOCH)
4. Water bath or dry block incubator at 25 °C
5. Stereomicroscope (Lancet, model: 217B)
6. Digital caliper (Starrett)
7. Tweezers (Labbox export)
8. Plankton net (Eisco, model: SKU BIO144)
9. Analytical balance (RADWAG AS 220.R2 220 g × 0.1 mg RS232)
10. Plastic aquarium (2 L, 20 × 15 × 15 cm) with perforated (squares of 1 cm2) walls, constructed with plastic mesh, fishing line, and plastic tape (Figure 1)
11. Circular PVC tank (600 L, 1.2 m diameter and 1.5 m depth)
12. Photoperiod (14:10) (Kalop)
13. Underwater loudspeaker (Lubell Labs Inc., USA, model: UW30, rated frequency response between 100 Hz and 10 kHz)
14. Power amplifier (American Pro, model: APXII-300, 230 V, 50 Hz)
15. Audio player: speaker or laptop with audio output
16. Hydrophone (Reson, model: TC4013, with a sensitivity response of -211 ± 3 dB re 1V/mPa between a wide frequency range of 1 Hz and 150 kHz)
17. Analogical-digital converter unit (Avisoft Bioacoustics, Avisoft UltraSoundGate 116 h digital acquisition card)
18. Preamplifier (1-MHz bandwidth single-ended voltage and a high-pass filter set at 10 Hz, 20 dB gain) (Avisoft Bioacoustics)
19. Laptop
Software and datasets
1. Avisoft Recorder USGH software (Avisoft Bioacoustics)
Procedure
文章信息
稿件历史记录
提交日期: Oct 13, 2025
接收日期: Dec 11, 2025
在线发布日期: Jan 8, 2026
出版日期: Jan 20, 2026
版权信息
© 2026 The Author(s); This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
如何引用
Mitton, F. M., Snitman, S. M., Ceraulo, M., Buscaino, G. and Sal Moyano, M. P. (2026). A Reproducible Method to Evaluate Sublethal Acoustic Stress in Aquatic Invertebrates Using Oxidative Biomarkers. Bio-protocol 16(2): e5581. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.5581.
分类
环境生物学 > 生态系统
您对这篇实验方法有问题吗?
在此处发布您的问题,我们将邀请本文作者来回答。同时,我们会将您的问题发布到Bio-protocol Exchange,以便寻求社区成员的帮助。
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link


